When should you block on Twitter
Feature | Latest

When should you block on Twitter?


With its relatively liberal policies on nudity, twitter stands alone as the most popular nudist-friendly social media platform out there these days. You can post nude photos, you can talk about nudity and nudism, and you can interact with other nudists openly.

Any of those things could see your posts removed and even your account banned on Facebook, Instagram, Tumblr, and most other social media sites. There are a few social media sites, like MeWe, that are open to nudist content, but they tend to have far fewer users.

Twitter stands alone as a destination for nudists. But a recent trend there has started to make it a less warm and welcoming place for nudists – and puts a serious damper on our connecting and socializing together.

That trend: blocking people.

Why Block?

There are plenty of good reasons to block people on twitter; it can be a toxic place.

Women – especially nudist women – are often (if not constantly) harassed, criticized, propositioned, judged, and vilified, and receive numerous creepy DMs and sexually-laden replies to every tweet. Many of my female nudist friends have reported on twitter blocking literally dozens of other users daily.

There are also people who come in to give unwanted and useless opinions. I myself don’t need to see more than one “Y’all are crazy” or “You’re going to hell for immodesty” comment before I hit the block button.

There are also users who will misuse others’ photos – reposting them without attributing them and without permission, often from accounts that are just roundups of nude photos with a single theme. I always block them too.

Finally, there are those with whom I disagree with so fundamentally that I don’t want to have anything to do with them – people who post racist and sexist “jokes” fall into this category. They probably don’t even know I’ve blocked them, but I don’t care – I want no association between my account and theirs.

My Policy

In general, though, unless a twitter user is being actively harmful, I don’t block them. They might have a feed full of extremely sexually explicit images and videos; they might have political views that are diametrically opposed to my own. But I won’t block them.

I also won’t follow them. Despite being a twitter account primarily about nudism, there are very few nude photos as I scroll down my feed. Most of the photos that appear are the header images for articles and blog posts, too. I just don’t follow photo-centric accounts.

At one time I was much more liberal than I am now. If someone followed me, I followed them back. If someone had an account that seemed connected with nudism, I followed them. But as time went on I’ve become more discerning, and I’ve even gone through my list of follows from time to time and pruned them.

So my policy is: block people who are actively problematic; follow people who are active and positive about nudism; and more or less ignore everyone else.

Continued… Read full original article…

Source: Matthew McDermott

Original publication 22 December, 2020

Posted on NatCorn 7th January 2021

Reference to an article does not infer endorsement of any views expressed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept the Privacy Policy